Energy investments require significant capital and involve multiple parties in the construction and operation of facilities. Due to the high risks inherent in these operations and the potential for substantial legal liabilities, contracts in the energy sector often include “knock-for-knock” clauses.
Understanding Knock-for-Knock Clauses
Knock-for-knock clauses can vary in their specifics, but generally, they establish an agreement where each party takes responsibility for damage to their own equipment and for injuries or fatalities to their own personnel, regardless of fault. This means that each party agrees not to claim compensation from the other party for such incidents.
In a typical knock-for-knock clause, each party is considered a “primary party,” and forms a group that includes its employees, directors, and subcontractors (as well as any subcontractors’ subcontractors, if applicable) for the purpose of risk allocation. All members of this group receive the same protection from the knock-for-knock clause as the primary party itself.
Risk Allocation and Claims
Under this system, parties agree that losses and damages stay “where they fall” without regard to fault. Therefore, even if the other party is at fault, there is no right to seek compensation from them. If a member of one group suffers a loss or damage, the primary party of that group assumes responsibility, and there is no recourse against the other group.
Benefits of Knock-for-Knock Clauses
Knock-for-knock clauses offer clarity regarding liability before an incident occurs, specifying which party is responsible for what. This predefined allocation of responsibility helps reduce insurance costs and avoids the time, expense, and difficulty associated with proving fault and causation in the event of an incident.
These clauses are also important for insurance practice as insurers may not accept a knock-for-knock clause that does not maintain a fair balance between the contracting parties.
Given the complexities and high risks of energy investments, the use and importance of knock-for-knock clauses are expected to increase. For example, in investments involving hydrogen, which is recognised as a clean energy source of the future but is also highly flammable and requires high amount of investment, the presence of such a contractual clause seems likely. The legal implications of incidents during the production, transportation, and storage of hydrogen make liability a crucial issue and therefore, knock for knock clauses could play important part in the relevant contracts in hydrogen related investments.
Waiving Subrogation
From the perspective of insurance law, knock-for-knock clauses typically require a waiver of subrogation. This means that insurers waive their right to pursue recovery from the other group involved in the contract. For instance, if an incident occurs due to a malfunction in one group’s equipment, causing damage and injuries in both groups, no cross-claims can be made between the two groups. Each group’s insurance policy is expected to cover the losses incurred by its members, and the waiver of subrogation prevents insurers from pursuing further claims against the other party.
Legal Challenges and Limitations
However, it is important to note that the application of these clauses may encounter obstacles under existing legal regimes. One key area of legal debate involves the potential conflict of knock-for-knock clauses with mandatory provisions in tort, energy, and environmental regulations in the jurisdictions where the clauses are to be applied.
In countries with strict liability regimes in tort law, the implementation of these clauses can be contentious. Such issues may lead to the invalidation or restriction of knock-for-knock clauses. Therefore, it is crucial to review the legislation in the countries where energy investments are made and knock-for-knock clauses are frequently used. Contracts should be drafted with this awareness, taking into account the comparative experiences of countries that have adopted these clauses.
Based on that, while knock-for-knock clauses can offer clarity, efficiency, and risk management benefits in high-risk energy investments, careful consideration of legal and regulatory contexts is essential to ensure their effective and enforceable application.
Disclaimer:
The information contained in INTERWITS’ articles is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice on any specific matter. Users should not rely on this information without seeking appropriate legal or professional advice tailored to their situation. INTERWITS disclaims any liability for any errors or omissions or for any actions taken based on the content of these articles. Redistribution or reproduction of this material without the express permission of INTERWITS is strictly prohibited.
For further inquiries, please contact: [email protected]
______________
2024 © INTERWITS